| Staff characteristics, working conditions and outcomes amongst staff in services for people with intellectual disabilities |
|
|
|
|
Hatton, C,. Rivers, M., Emerson, E., Kiernan, C., Reeves, D., Alborz, A., Mason, H., & Mason, L., 1999, Reviewed by Eric Emerson, MethodologyPostal survey of 512 staff from seven community-based services for people with learning disabilities. Majority of staff (273) working in residential settings. Critical AppraisalNo clear basis for the selection of participating services. While the response rate (42%) is good for postal survey, it still creates problems in judging the extent to which results can be generalised to the total workforce in participating organisations. Use of well validated measures. Key FindingsResults indicated that:
Social Work Practice/ Policy ImplicationsThe high rates of psychological distress and poor self-reported health are likely to detract from the efficiency of the workforce employed in supported accommodation services. Further analyses of these data (Hatton, C., Emerson, E., Rivers, M., Mason, H., Mason, L., Swarbrick, R., Kiernan, C., Reeves, D., & Alborz, A., [1999]. Factors associated with staff stress and work satisfaction in services for people with intellectual disability. ( Journal of Intellectual Disability Research 43 , 253-267.) indicated that psychological distress and job strain were related to:
|